|Major Groups > Boletes > Leccinum > Uncertain|
Leccinum: Uncertain Taxa
by Michael Kuo
Leccinum aurantiacum (Bulliard) Gray, 1821.
= Boletus aurantiacus Bulliard, 1780
Despite the popularity of the name aurantiacum for North American Leccinum collections, current morphological and molecular data do not support the idea that Leccinum aurantiacum occurs in North America:
Leccinum aurantiacum is probably a European species, and no records are known from North America. The descriptions of L. aurantiacum in North American literature represent a mixture between a L. vulpinum-like, conifer associated taxon and North American species that are associated with broad-leaved trees, such as L. insigne, and L. brunneum.
As it is now defined, Leccinum aurantiacum is a mycorrhizal "generalist," associating with hosts ranging from Fagus and Quercus to Betula and Populus; it is the "one major exception" to high host specificity in the genus (den Bakker et al., 2004b; the paper did not consider species like Leccinum chromapes and Leccinum subglabripes in section Luteoscabra, which may also be generalists). However, Leccinum aurantiacum does not associate with conifers--and this idea, combined with morphological analysis, places many North American "Leccinum aurantiacum" collections in the vicinity of the conifer-loving Leccinum vulpinum.
Morphologically, Leccinum aurantiacum can be separated from similar species (in Europe, at least) on the basis of the "brownish-reddish stipital ornamentation that is already reddish in young fruit-bodies," the red to reddish brown cap, the presence of overhanging flaps, and the reddish brown (in KOH) caulocystidia (den Bakker & Noordeloos, 2005). It is worth pointing out that the original description of Boletus aurantiacus (Bulliard, 1780) was accompanied by a beautiful color illustration clearly depicting reddish brown, rather than black, scabers. To get an idea of what contemporary European researchers have in mind for the reddish brown scaber color in Leccinum aurantiacum, see den Bakker & Noordeloos (2005). Then compare the photo to color illustrations in your North American field guide's treatment of Leccinum aurantiacum. In my library, all the illustrations but one show black, rather than reddish brown, scabers--and close inspection of most of the photos also reveals conifer debris in the vicinity of the mushrooms. One exception is the photo in Phillips (1991), which features a North American aurantiacum-like collection with reddish brown, rather than black, scabers. The following field guide illustrations appear to possibly represent Leccinum vulpinum:
The den Bakker & Noordeloos account of scaber color and caulocystidia in Leccinum, if it can be applied to our continent in whole or in part, handily cleans up much of the confusion among North American taxa. Leccinum aurantiacum var. pinicola Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966), with black scabers that are brown in KOH, is referred to Leccinum vulpinum (the association with conifers also supports this idea). Leccinum aurantiacum var. pallidipes Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966), with whitish scabers that are ochraceous in KOH, is possibly referred to Leccinum albostipitatum (and, if this hypothesis is borne out by further evidence, necessitates a nomenclatural change since Smith, Thiers & Watling would have described pallidipes long before European researchers arrived at albostipitatum). Leccinum aurantiacum var. intermedium Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966), with black scabers that are brown in KOH, is referred to Leccinum vulpinum (additionally, though the authors were unwilling to declare certainty about mycorrhizal association, they listed Pinus resinosa and Pinus banksiana in the collection area). Lastly, Leccinum aurantiacum var. aurantiacum in the sense of Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966, 1971) must be reconsidered, at least in part, since it has black scabers that are yellowish in KOH.
At this point I am not able to formulate a hypothesis regarding where, exactly, Leccinum aurantiacum sensu Smith, Thiers & Watling belongs--but I am also not yet willing to accept the idea put forth by den Bakker & Noordeloos (2005) that "Leccinum aurantiacum is probably a European species, and no records are known from North America." Though they are correct that much of what is called "Leccinum aurantiacum" on this continent probably belongs in Leccinum vulpinum, we do appear to have an aurantiacum-like taxon with reddish brown scabers, growing under Populus and Betula. When Smith & Thiers (1971) write that "in L. aurantiacum it is not uncommon to find basidiocarps with the stipe nearly white when half expanded and with the ornamentation becoming orange-tan or more reddish before finally going to black," I suspect they are combining their many observations of aurantiacum-like collections and superimposing, at least in part, an artificial experiential continuum--especially since Smith & Thiers were at odds with Singer on a concept for Leccinum and were somewhat stubbornly insisting on blackening scabers for the genus (see Smith & Thiers, 1968) despite describing taxa with pale scabers (as pointed out by Singer, 1986). In short, I am not convinced that all of the reddish-brown scabers in North America darken to black. And while den Bakker & Noordeloos cite plenty of material to support reliable conclusions about European species, their experience with North American specimens is minimal and may easily be insufficient to declare that Leccinum aurantiacum, which their own previous publication (2004b) argues is a highly facultative generalist, does not occur here.
Leccinum barrowsii Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1966.
Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966) described Leccinum barrowsii on the basis of a single collection of immature mushrooms made by Charles Barrows
Leccinum clavatum Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1966.
Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966) named Leccinum clavatum on the basis of a single collection made by Smith (AHS 15961) in 1941 "under spruce and fir" in Idaho. "The diagnostic features of this species," they wrote, "are the whitish pileus which finally becomes the color of pale toast on the disc, the young injured tube mouths staining brown when injured severely, the base of the stipe staining methyl blue on mature basidiocarps, the white stipe-ornamentation slowly becoming brown as the basidiocarps age, and the clavate-bulbous stipe. The pileus margin is frequently intergrown with the stipe in the manner of a Gastroboletus." They described the cap as having overhanging flaps, and the pileipellis as a "matted-down aggregation of fibrils" with "end-cells 5-15 µ diam. and tubular to narrowly clavate." Two further collections labeled Leccinum clavatum are in the University of Michigan herbarium. One of these was later identified by Thiers as Suillus granulatus, according to the herbarium record; the other is a collection from New Mexico made by Charles Barrows under spruce in 1957. Smith, Thiers & Watling do not cite the Barrows collection in 1966 (nor do they quote a range beyond Idaho for the species), so the identification should probably be viewed as tentative. No collections labeled Leccinum clavatum are in NY, TENN or OSU. BPI holds one collection, apparently a syntype, citing the Smith type collection number, date, and location; BPI appears to have inherited the collection from Snell's private herbarium. No sequences labeled Leccinum clavatum have been deposited in GenBank.
The European Leccinum crocipodium is mycorrhizal with oaks or hornbeam, and is well supported (see den Bakker & Noordeloos, 2005). Separation from North America's Leccinum rugosiceps is supported by preliminary molecular evidence (Binder & Hibbet, 2004; den Bakker & Noordeloos, 2005) and by morphology: Leccinum crocipodium has a bright yellow pore surface when young, a yellowish stem that is habitually (though not always) swollen in the midportion, and scabers that are frequently arranged in a pattern of lines or ridges, suggestive of a wide-meshed reticulum.
However, the presence of Leccinum crocipodium in North America is certainly debatable. Very few North American records for the taxon exist, and several of the existing records are dubious. (I have not collected the species, nor have I examined material collected by others.) Only seven records for Leccinum crocipodium can be found in online herbaria. In NY, Halling 7216 (from Costa Rica) is catalogued as Leccinum crocipodium--but this collection is cited in Halling & Mueller (2003) as a collection of Leccinum neotropicalis. No records for Leccinum crocipodium occur in TENN or OSU. BPI holds one collection (McKnight 14147, from Virginia in 1974). MICH holds five collections: two from Europe; an early Smith collection (AHS 7485) from Tennessee in 1937, not cited by Smith in his later publications treating the taxon (1967, 1971); and two made by Guravich (803 and 857) in Mississippi in 1976. One of the Guravich collections (it is not entirely clear which) is featured in a photograph of Leccinum crocipodium in Weber & Smith's 1985 Field Guide to Southern Mushrooms (plate 51, page 82); this photo is also used in Bessette, Roody & Bessette (2000, plate Leccinum nigrescens [A], p. 327). I have examined Weber's notes in MICH for "Guravich 803 also 857," which indicate some struggle with identification (several taxon names have been crossed out and amended), though her final conclusion appears to be "crocipodium ss. late European authors (not Boletes of Mich)." The Guravich photo does make a fairly good match for the European Leccinum crocipodium, and Weber's notes on the exsiccata also describe a plausible match. John Plischke's photo (above) also makes a good match for Leccinum crocipodium; it represents an unvouchered Ohio collection from a club foray (the mushrooms were repositioned for the photo, and data for the collection's ecology is not available). The European species is well represented by online photographs that appear to correspond with the 2005 description by den Bakker & Noordeloos, and also appear to correspond with the Guravich and Plischke photos.
"Leccinum crocipodium" sensu Smith, Thiers & Watling (1967) and sensu Smith & Thiers (1971) may be different. The authors described Leccinum crocipodium in North America on the basis of a sole collection from an Ypsilanti, Michigan, golf course (AHS 64289), and were careful to note that Leccinum crocipodium was "apparently very rare in North America" and that their collection featured differences from European collections. In the course of identifying the Guravich collections, Weber did not feel that the 1971 Smith & Thiers description corresponded to the Mississippi material or to European descriptions of Leccinum crocipodium, but her decision appears to be based primarily on spore dimensions; she measured "12.0-13.5 (15) X 5-6.5 µm" for the Mississippi collections and wrote "spores small for crocipodium - American variant" in her notes. In describing the Ypsilanti collection, Smith, Thiers & Watling (1967) noted:
Our material differs slightly from descriptions of European collections in having a more permanent scarlet to dull red stipe-base, the surface of the stipe being more olive-buff than yellow when fresh, and in the lack of yellow in the fresh tubes. The latter is the more significant difference but on drying the tubes of the American specimens became yellow so the apparent differences are not given taxonomic emphasis at this time.
These words are not repeated in the more readily available 1971 publication (though the morphological description is reiterated word for word) and are worthy of attention, since they document some hesitation on the part of the authors. Widespread use of The Boletes of Michigan has probably led to many "Leccinum crocipodium" identifications based solely on proximity to Leccinum rugosiceps and width of spores, since the 1971 key to section Luteoscabra points immediately to Leccinum crocipodium if spores measure "6-8 µ in diameter." The Ypsilanti collection does not appear in the online Leccinum records at MICH; either it is in another herbarium (though not NY, BPI, TENN, or OSU) or there is a labeling problem.
Leccinum neotropicalis Halling (1999), well represented by multiple collections under various oaks in Costa Rica, is very similar; it has a bright yellow pore surface and a yellowish stem that is "equal to clavate to subclavate, sometimes with a tapered and pointed base." However, it differs from Leccinum crocipodium in its darker pileus colors, non-staining context, and clavate to lageniform (rather than lageniform to fusoid) caulocystidia.
Molecular Data: Four partial sequences have been deposited in GenBank with the label Leccinum crocipodium. One deposit does not document a collection location; the others are from Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. Several of these sequences have been aligned in recent papers, including Binder & Besl (2000), den Bakker et al. (2004a, 2004b), Binder & Hibbet (2004), and den Bakker & Noordeloos (2005).
Leccinum fallax Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1966.
A conifer-associated taxon from the Rocky Mountains, Leccinum fallax was authored by Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966) with an Idaho collection (AHS 15962) made "under spruce" designated as the type collection. "The distinctive features of this species," the authors wrote, "are the pigment masses that form in Melzer's, the dark red pileus, the stipe ornamentation that does not turn black, and the conspicuously clavate-bulbous stipe." The species has a cap with overhanging flaps, flesh that stains slowly grayish, a bluing stem base, and clavate caulocystidia that are "hyaline to yellowish" in KOH. Eleven collections labeled Leccinum fallax, including the type collection, can be found in the University of Michigan herbarium. Collection locations include Idaho, Wyoming, Oregon, and New Mexico. Four of the collections indicate spruce as the associated tree, one indicates "conifers," and the remaining six are silent. A record for a 1954 collection from Idaho (AHS 45453) includes the notation "[d]ark red western
Leccinum fibrillosum Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1966.
Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966) described Leccinum fibrillosum as growing "under mixed conifers" with "lodgepole pine present," and designated an Idaho collection (AHS 66337) as the type collection. They described a "dark liver-brown," fibrillose cap with overhanging flaps; flesh that turns reddish, then purplish gray when sliced; a whitish to grayish pore surface that bruises brown; a sturdy stem with scabers "which soon blacken" (it is unclear whether they are white or brown before maturity) and a tendency to bruise bluish near the base; spores measuring 14-18 (20) X 3.8-5 µ; scattered fusoid-ventricose hymenial cystidia; a pileipellis disposed as a cutis of filamentous hyphae 6-12 µ wide with narrow terminal elements, not developing pigment globules in Melzer's; and "ovate-pointed" caulocystidia up to 60 X 18 µ ("hyaline or with colored content" in KOH, with the precise color unspecified). As with several species treated in the 1966 publication, it would have been impossible for the authors themselves to use their key to arrive at an identification of Leccinum fibrillosum, since the key relies heavily on spore print color but the description of the species lists "none obtained" under this feature. Seven collections of Leccinum fibrillosum are online in the University of Michigan herbarium. Five, including the type collection, are from Idaho; two are from Colorado. Three of the collections do not document a host, three document "conifers," and one collection was found under "Alnus and conifers." No collections labeled Leccinum fibrillosum are in OSU, TENN, or NY. BPI holds two collections, one of which is a syntype (AHS 66337) from Snell's private herbarium; the other is a McKnight collection made in a "pine forest" in Wyoming in 1965 and identified (later, since the publication date for Leccinum fibrillosum is 1966) by F. Anderson. No sequences labeled Leccinum fibrillosum have been deposited in GenBank. As a morphological species Leccinum fibrillosum may be a candidate for synonymy with Leccinum vulpinum, but further study is required since the caulocystidia and scabers are insufficiently described, the flesh may stain too readily, the spores are apparently longer and more slender (the shape is potentially more important than the size), and the cap is brown.
Leccinum flavostipitatum Dick & Snell, 1965.
Dick and Snell authored Leccinum flavostipitatum in 1965, citing "stands of Picea glauca" in Nova Scotia as its habitat and WHS 2534 (now held in both BPI and MICH) as the type collection. The species has a grayish brown pileus that lacks overhanging marginal flaps, a distinctively yellowing stipe surface, brown to black scabers, and bluing context in the stipe base. Aside from the type collection(s), only one collection labeled Leccinum flavostipitatum is found in online herbaria (in NY, from Maine, in beech-hemlock woods). But despite being poorly documented Leccinum flavostipitatum is potentially very important since it appears to be a conifer-associated species that lacks overhanging flaps--which, if true, would place it subsection Scabra or Fumosa of section Leccinum as the only known (so far) conifer-loving species in either subsection. In separate studies by den Bakker & Noordeloos (2005) and Binder & Hibbett (2004), the DNA of a specimen identified as Leccinum flavostipitatum and deposited in GenBank by Binder & Besl (AF139696, with no voucher citation or collection location) grouped in section Leccinum, fairly clearly separated from subsection Leccinum but not definitively placed in either subsection Scabra or Fumosa. Misidentification of the specimen should not be ruled out, but the preliminary result definitely warrants further investigation.
Although Dick & Snell listed "white spruce and yellow birch" in "Nova Scotia and Michigan" for habitat and range in their later (1970) publication, the yellow birch and Michigan references should be discounted. Careful reading of four publications that came on one another's heels (Dick & Snell, 1965; Smith Thiers & Watling, 1967; Snell & Dick, 1970; and Smith & Thiers, 1971) reveals that Smith & Thiers thought they had a Michigan collection of Leccinum flavostipitatum, made under yellow birch (AHS 66637, represented by a single mushroom)--but changed their minds after examining Dick & Snell's type collection, since AHS 66637 had a stem that was not yellow in the dried state, as well as tissues that reacted differently to Melzer's and habitat under birch (see Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1967). Dick and Snell apparently did not receive the news that the Michigan collection was not a match for Leccinum flavostipitatum before the 1970 manuscript was in press; Smith & Thiers (1971) then included the taxon in their treatment of Michigan boletes, perhaps to provide a bit of cover for Snell & Dick, saying: "on several occasions we thought we had found it here in Michigan. An examination of the type proved this to be erroneous, but we expect it will eventually turn up in our area."
Leccinum idahoense Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1968.
Described by Smith, Thiers & Watling in 1968 on the basis of a single collection, Leccinum idahoense grew under "Thuja plicata, Thuja heterophylla, and with occasional Pinus monticola in the area." Aside from the type collection (AHS 73874), no other collections of this taxon can be found in MICH, NY, TENN, OSU, or BPI. No sequences labeled Leccinum idahoense have been deposited in GenBank. The description of morphological features by Smith, Thiers & Watling suggests Leccinum vulpinum, with the exception of the "dark liver-brown" pileus color and the hymenial and caulocystidia turning "smoky brown" in KOH.
Leccinum ponderosum Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1966.
Leccinum ponderosum was described by Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966) from Oregon, under "Pinus ponderosa and P. lambertina," with AHS 55718 (in MICH) cited as the type collection. The authors described it as "the monster of all the large western species of Leccinum," with a cap 10-30 cm across. Leccinum ponderosum parallels the contemporary concept of Leccinum vulpinum in its association with conifers, red cap, overhanging marginal flaps, dark scabers, and bluing stem base. Aside from its large size, morphological differences between it and Leccinum vulpinum are potentially negligible: the stem base blues enthusiastically; the scabers are "avellaneous to fuscous" in the fresh state, but "near 'snuff brown'" in exsiccata; the sliced context does not stain "appreciably," though there are "a few gray streaks" on the sliced surfaces of exsiccata; the spores are slightly longer than those cited by den Bakker & Noordeloos (2005) for Leccinum vulpinum; the hymenial cystidia are brown or ochraceous in KOH, rather than reddish brown; and the caulocystidia are "smoky ochraceous" rather than brownish. Aside from the type collection, MICH holds three collections labeled Leccinum ponderosum; of these, two are not annotated and the third lists "Pinus" as the associated tree. One well documented collection labeled Leccinum ponderosum in OSU lists "Tsuga mertensiana, Abies amabilis, Pinus contorta, Picea engelmannii, Vaccinium membranaceum, Vaccinium scoparium" (four conifers and two bushes in the Ericales) under habitat. BPI holds one collection of Leccinum ponderosum; it appears to be a combination of two Smith collections (AHS 15897 and AHS 15935) from Idaho in 1941, made under spruce, coming to BPI via the private herbarium of Snell. No collections are held in NY or TENN, and no sequences labeled Leccinum ponderosum have been deposited in GenBank.
Leccinum roseoscabrum Singer & Williams, 1992.
Described by Singer & Williams (1992), Leccinum roseoscabrum certainly appears morphologically distinct from close relatives on the basis of the characters emphasized in the key (see couplet 9)--and possibly by its host preference. I do not find microscopic characters in the species description (which is quite thorough) that would help to separate this taxon from Leccinum crocipodium or Leccinum rugosiceps. Microscopic features (spores, basidium, hymenial cystidia, pileipellis elements, and caulocystidia) are illustrated in the authoring publication; a photograph of mushrooms in the fresh state, taken by Williams, can be found in Bessette, Roody & Bessette (2002, p. 328; plate "Leccinum roseoscabrum A"). Singer & Williams cite two collections in F as the type and holotype; I know of no other records of this taxon. No sequences labeled Leccinum roseoscabrum have been deposited in GenBank, and no papers that I am aware of have aligned its DNA. Hopefully the inclusion of Leccinum roseoscabrum in the popular field guide by Bessette, Roody & Bessette will lead to further collections, identifications, and documentation (especially of precise host preferences).
Leccinum rubropunctum (Peck) Singer, 1947.
= Boletus rubropunctus Peck, 1898
I believe that Leccinum rubropunctum may be a distinct morphological species, separated from Leccinum longicurvipes on the basis of the characters used in the key (see couplet 8). Roy Halling's concept of the species, illustrated in NY online records, probably represents Peck's mushroom. However, I am treating the taxon as "uncertain" because we have few reliable descriptions of the mushroom's macromorphology other than Peck's original account: pileus "reddish-brown, flesh yellowish, unchangeable; tubes bright golden yellow, stipe yellow, punctate with reddish dots or squamules" (quoted in Both, 1993). Other accounts come from authors (Coker & Beers, 1943; Singer, 1947; Snell & Dick, 1970) who thought rubropunctum and longicurvipes were synonyms, and may represent mixed data. Semi-technical field guide descriptions (Smith, Smith & Weber, 1981; Bessette, Roody & Bessette, 2000) are not thorough and should not be relied on. Smith & Thiers (1971, p. 315) studied the type collection of Boletus rubropunctus and recorded micromorphology thoroughly, but did not describe any of their own collections. One of Smith's collections in MICH (AHS 10315) is labeled Boletus rubropunctus, but should be viewed as suspect since it was made on the same day, in the same location as the type collection of Boletus longicurvipes (AHS 10320). One Thiers collection in MICH (HDT 7097) from Alabama is labeled Leccinum rubropunctum, but is not cited or described in the 1971 publication, which designated Michigan as its study area. Snell's portion of the Boletus longicurvipes type collection (WHS 897, cited along with AHS 10320 in the original description) is now in BPI, labeled Leccinum rubropunctum, citing Snell himself as the determiner. Thus one of the two authors of Boletus longicurvipes (Smith) continued to believe it was distinct from Peck's Boletus rubropunctus; the other author (Snell) apparently agreed with Singer and others that the two were synonymous. Smith may never have seen rubropunctus in the fresh state; Snell probably did, but did not describe it separately--though the Dick illustration for Leccinum rubropunctum in Snell's monograph (Plate 62) appears to depict two rather distinct mushrooms, one of which has a bright yellow pore surface and a yellow stem (Leccinum rubropunctum?) and one of which has a dull yellowish pore surface and a whitish stem (Leccinum longicurvipes?). Smith and Thiers felt the two taxa were reliably separated by spore size, but they apparently based this claim on analysis of one Boletus rubropunctus specimen (the type), and unless the idea is supported by future analysis of many well documented specimens it should be discarded.
In this context of taxonomic and descriptive confusion, it should be clear that DNA results for "Leccinum rubropunctum" (Binder & Besl, 2000; Binder & Hibbett, 2004; den Bakker & Noordeloos, 2005) approach being meaningless. Four sequences bearing the species name Boletus rubropunctus are deposited in GenBank (AY612812, AY615911, AF139687, and AD001607) and have been aligned by these authors (clading with Leccinum longicurvipes and Leccinum subglabripes), but only two of the deposits cite a voucher, none cites a physical deposit in a public herbarium, and (most importantly) we have no idea who identified the specimens or what concept of "Boletus rubropunctus" was used.
The best way to clear up this mess would be to sequence the DNA of the type collections of the two taxa--but since that is unlikely (Peck's mushroom is 109 years old; Snell & Smith's mushrooms are 69 years old), Roy Halling's 2003 collection of Boletus rubropunctus (REH 8501) could serve as an initial representative for the taxon for further molecular and morphological studies.
Leccinum subfulvum Smith, Thiers & Watling, 1966.
Unless further collections of Leccinum subfulvum are documented or study of the type collection provides additional data, this taxon should probably be excluded from Leccinum treatments in the future. It was named by Smith, Thiers & Watling in 1966 on the basis of a single collection (AHS 40334, in MICH), made under Pinus contorta in Mt. Rainier National Park. "This species is distinct," the authors write, "by the clay-colored squamulose pileus at maturity, the unchanging flesh when cut, the dull clay-colored ornamentation of the stipe which does not blacken in age or on drying, and the lack of pigment globules in the cutis hyphae when revived in Melzer's." However, the brief description of macroscopic features makes it fairly clear that the authors did not study or annotate the collection when it was fresh, and the reference to the non-darkening scabers is based on examination of the stem in the dried state ("ornamentation . . . concolorous with the cutis of the cap as dried"). Documentation of micromorphology is not as rigorous as in other species described by the authors, and several dimensions and staining reactions are missing. No further collections are cited by the authors, and Thiers does not include the species in later treatments of western species. Smith later lists it as "rare" in a field guide treatment (Smith, Smith & Weber, 1981)--which might easily mean it has not been found since the inadequately described type collection. No collections labeled Leccinum subfulvum are in NY, TENN, OSU, or BPI, and MICH holds only the type collection. No sequences bearing the species label have been deposited in GenBank.
Smith, Thiers & Watling (1966) describe a collection of Leccinum vulpinum from Barry County, Michigan (AHS 72725), "in mixed woods with pine," and this collection is again cited in Smith & Thiers (1971). Since Watling is the author of the species, he presumably agreed with the identification in the 1966 publication that bore his name and documented the Michigan collection--which means we can probably assume that this collection represents the concept of the species as it was named by Watling in 1961. I find no substantial differences between the Smith, Thiers & Watling description and the den Bakker & Noordeloos description.
No collections labeled Leccinum vulpinum are found in the online records of NY, TENN, BPI, or OSU. MICH holds 19 collections, 5 of which are Watling collections from conifer forests in Sweden, and 14 of which come from North America. Among the North American records that document tree associations (5 are silent on habitat) a few mention conifers but a small majority document hardwoods (primarily aspen). While misidentification resulting from the use of uninformative morphological characters may explain this discrepancy, it is also quite possible that conifers were in the collection areas and went unnoticed; most of the records in question come from woods I am quite familiar with (in Emmet and Cheboygan counties, in Michigan, and in San Miguel County, Colorado), and scattered conifers are almost always present in aspen-dominated stands in these areas.
Three partial sequences in GenBank bear the label Leccinum vulpinum. Two of these (AF454580, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, 28s; and AY538792, Gapdh) represent a den Bakker collection from Norway (hdb92). The third (AY538793, Gapdh) is a den Bakker collection from Canada (hdb415). The Norwegian collection is aligned in the papers of den Bakker and collaborators (2004a, 2004b), and the North American collection is cited in den Bakker & Noordeloos (2005) under "Collections studied" for Leccinum vulpinum, with a note saying its alignment "was nearly identical to the Gapdh sequence of L. vulpinum from Norway."
Probable and Possible Synonymy with Leccinum vulpinum:
The references cited on this page are included in the Leccinum References.
This site contains no information about the edibility or toxicity of mushrooms.
Cite this page as:
Kuo, M. (2007, May). Leccinum: Uncertain taxa. Retrieved from the MushroomExpert.Com Web site: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/leccinum_uncertain.html